Posted by Jay G. on 06/11/06 13:19

On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 18:33:26 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:05:41 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>
>>On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 05:17:10 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>>>
>>> It competed with the remtal market... for ALL rental products that
>>> were video related...
>>
>>...Including DVD. So you admit it.
>>
>
> You're an idiot. You said it competed with the DVD form factor.

I did not. I never even used the phrase "form factor." I'm not even sure
how the form factor of the two formats would apply here, since DIVX was a
DVD in every way except for encryption scheme.

> It competed with RENTALS...

....which include rentals of DVDs. So you agree it was competing with DVDs
in at least one way.

> Period!

No, since DIVX included a non-rental format as well.

-Jay

[Back to original message]