Posted by ZnU on 06/13/06 04:01

In article <1150091320.948927.130150@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
"FatKat" <robynari@juno.com> wrote:

> ZnU wrote:
> > In article <1150078008.024852.119950@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> > "FatKat" <robynari@juno.com> wrote:
> >
> > > ZnU wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > They're
> > > > significantly larger, hold less music (unless you feel like carrying
> > > > around 90 CDs, to match the capacity of a 60 GB iPod), and have vastly
> > > > inferior user interfaces.
> > >
> > > I've held both iPods and CD players - both can be held with one hand -
> > > so "significantly larger" is just plain wrong.
> >
> > You're either trolling, or you're just nuts. Either way, it's a waste of
> > my time.
>
> Must be trolling - isn't that always the easiest answer for dupes like
> you? Steve Jobs sold you a bag of goods, and if there's somebody else
> out there who won't bend as easily as you, he must be a troll. Face
> it, nothing you've said about iPod justifies the outrageous sums that
> owners have to shell out, unless you're either too lazy or just overly
> challenged by something as prosaic as a CD player.

Yeah, right. I'm a dupe because I prefer a device which hold far more
music than a CD/MP3 player, actually fits in my pocket, and can
synchronize music, playlists, ratings, equalizer settings, podcasts and
everything else with my desktop computer in a few seconds, instead of
requiring me to manually burn CDs.

Yup. Valuing any of that trivial nonsense is just nuts. I must be
brainwashed.

--
"Those who enter the country illegally violate the law."
-- George W. Bush in Tucson, Ariz., Nov. 28, 2005

[Back to original message]