Posted by NRen2k5 on 06/13/06 08:42

Jim wrote:
> In article <fVsjg.21230$U84.449908@wagner.videotron.net>, NRen2k5 wrote:
>>>> That is supposing Napster is still around and you still sub to them.
>>> Quite. If I had to put money on a service still being there five years
>>> from now, I wouldn't be betting on Napster.
>> I wouldn't be betting on iTunes. Sooner or later, the law catches up
>> with criminals like these.
>
> That would be the case if they were breaking the law. They're not.
>
> And if you're going to counter this with 'yes they are' then please cite
> the *exact* law they're breaking.

I already told you about anti-competition law.

It's rapidly becoming clear that you have nothing more to say on the
matter so you're just going to repeat the same tired garbage and declare
yourself the winner when I get tired of it and move on.

- NRen2k5

[Back to original message]