Posted by NRen2k5 on 06/13/06 09:40

RichardK wrote:
> NRen2k5 wrote:
>> Jim wrote:
>>
>>> In article <fVsjg.21230$U84.449908@wagner.videotron.net>, NRen2k5 wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> That is supposing Napster is still around and you still sub to them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Quite. If I had to put money on a service still being there five years
>>>>> from now, I wouldn't be betting on Napster.
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn't be betting on iTunes. Sooner or later, the law catches up
>>>> with criminals like these.
>>>
>>>
>>> That would be the case if they were breaking the law. They're not.
>>>
>>> And if you're going to counter this with 'yes they are' then please cite
>>> the *exact* law they're breaking.
>>
>>
>> I already told you about anti-competition law.
>
> No you didn't. You haven't actually presented anything which
> demonstrates Apple are breaking any laws at all.

You'd claim water wasn't wet while you're drowning...

>> It's rapidly becoming clear that you have nothing more to say on the
>> matter so you're just going to repeat the same tired garbage and
>> declare yourself the winner when I get tired of it and move on.
>
> Aww, you just don't like your own tactics being used against you...

Show me where you've moved on.

- NRen2k5

[Back to original message]