Posted by NRen2k5 on 06/14/06 06:12

Jim wrote:
> NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> wrote:
>
>> Jim wrote:
>>> NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> No. Because regardless, there is that illegal lock-in.
>>> Time for you to put up or shut up. Show *exactly* how it is illegal.
>>> Cite the *exact* law that's being broken.
>>>
>>> Jim
>> Time for you to show how exactly how it is *not* illegal.
>
> Are you stupid? The burden of proof lies with the accuser.
>
> It's guilt that has to be proven, not innocence.

This is Usenet, not a court of law.

--
http://pcguyelevated.ytmnd.com/

[Back to original message]