Posted by Jim on 06/14/06 11:16

In article <gXRjg.33568$G97.588909@weber.videotron.net>, NRen2k5 wrote:
>>>>> Time for you to show how exactly how it is *not* illegal.
>>>> Are you stupid? The burden of proof lies with the accuser.
>>>>
>>>> It's guilt that has to be proven, not innocence.
>>> This is Usenet, not a court of law.
>>
>> In other words, you can't prove that Apple are breaking any laws.
>>
>> Thank you for admitting it.
>
> In other words yes.
>
> Which doesn't mean that I can't claim that they are

I don't object to you stating that as an opinion. I objected to you
stating it as a fact.

> nor does it mean
> that I have been proven wrong

You've been proven wrong on a number of issues so far. I can't prove
that Apple aren't breaking any laws. You can't prove they are.

> nor does it mean that they in reality
> aren't actually breaking any laws.
>
> It just means that I don't have the proof.

Which means they're innocent in the eyes of the law. That's how it works.
Innocent until proven guilty.

Jim
--
Find me at http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk
JediGeeks http://www.jedigeeks.com
"Ah, gentle dames, it gars me greet, To think how monie councels sweet,
How monie lengthen'd, sage advices, The Husband frae the wife despises!"

[Back to original message]