Posted by Fakename on 01/08/89 11:32

It wasn't nice. It was an "on the spot" replace or upgrade warranty I
paid extra for when I bought the unit.


SBFan2000 wrote:
> "Fakename" <fakename12345@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:R2Xff.547463$tl2.262304@pd7tw3no...
>
>>Had a pioneer single layer burner, which died. Got warranty-replaced
>>with an LG double layer burner.
>>
>>Never buying a pioneer device again.
>
>
> Thats certainly your choice, but if it were me I would realize how nice it
> was that they replaced it with a DL drive. After all every company occasion
> puts out a device with a problem. They could have just replaced it with the
> same type remanufactured drive.
>
>
>>
>>John wrote:
>>
>>>Has anyone got a Pioneer DVD-RW drive that burns to Dual Layer discs
>>>without any problems?
>>>
>>>Pioneer CS are starting to piss me off. They are asking me to try
>>>burning 8GB of normal data files to the DVD-R Dual Layer disc. Burning
>>>a Video DVD didn't work to a Dual Layer disc on my DVR-109 drive.
>>>
>>>I can't see what difference burning data would make. Even if it worked
>>>(which would waste a disc, and DL discs are not that cheap) it still
>>>means my Pioneer Dvr-109 drive doesn't support the burning of DVD
>>>video to DL as it is supposed to.
>>>
>>>I can burn the same video to a single layer disc if I use less quality
>>>so it fits.
>>>
>>>John
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Back to original message]