Posted by doc on 01/11/23 11:50

these two are the same guys who said, "we'll never land on the moon, that's
ludacrest."

look, the best camera in the hands of an amatuer is amatuer results but an
amateur camera in the hands of a pro produces astonishing results.

moreover, if the company that manufactures the camera produces it in their
pro line cameras, then it was produced for and used by professionals
(although some consumers may be able to afford and will buy it - - but . .
tha doesn't make it prosumer) if it can be bought at best buy and looks
professional then we have a winner - - A PROSUMER!

drd

"Larry the Free" <usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97AAAEE54BCFthefrogprince@70.169.32.36...
> Waiving the right to remain silent, "Steve Guidry"
> <steveguidryremovethis@earthlink.net> said:
>
>> Maybe I'm being too picky. But that's my take on it.
>
> My experience matches yours. After shading up to seven cameras for
> hundreds of broadcast shows, and now live events, I believe that our
> "eye" for matching cameras differs greatly from the average Joe.
>
> I can't tolerate even the slightest difference, even if the client is
> blind to it.
>
> --
> Larry Jandro
> Video Engineering & Equipment Rentals
> Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
> [Remove spamtrap in ALLCAPS to reply]

[Back to original message]