Posted by NRen2k5 on 06/18/06 16:37

Jesse wrote:
> NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> wrote in news:XBvkg.14544$Ra3.168951
> @weber.videotron.net:
>
>> Jesse wrote:
>>> NRen2k5 <napsterneorenegade@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:ffXGf.1618$1U6.189164@weber.videotron.net:
>>>
>>>> Jesse wrote:
>>>>> Joel <joelx@usa.net> wrote in
>>>>> news:temlu19jimua8m9c6rhfa8p2r7fmkcg6p1@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jesse <org@org.orgy> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> labicff@yahoo.com wrote in news:1126144848.104179.218880
>>>>>>> @g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is it because the heardphones are not good enough as an antenna for
>>>>>>>> am radio. I would like to record some am programs on a compact
> mp3
>>>>>>>> player.
>>>>>>> No, it is because no one is stupid enough to design and market an
> mp3
>>>>>>> player just for you.
>>>>>> But you are stupid enough to reply to five-month-old messages.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry Blow-All, it just so happens I have a life and don't come here
>>>>> much more often than that .. With the notable exception of today.
>>>>> Permit me to ANSWER WHAT THE FUCK I WANT WHEN I WANT TO AND HOW I WANT
>>>>> TO TO WHOEVER THE FUCK I WANT TO .... If you don't mind.
>
>>>> Of course you can do that. And so can we. By calling you an asshole for
>>>> instance.
>>>>
>>>> - NRen2k5
>>>>
>>> "We" ?
>>> Someone die and make you official spokesperson here ?
>> No. Did I ever imply that? No.
>
> Yes. You do know what "we" means, right ?
>
> We : Used by the speaker or writer to indicate the speaker or writer along
> with another or others as the subject: We made it to the lecture hall on
> time. We are planning a trip to Arizona this winter.
> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/we
>
> So .. You and who else are you speaking for ?

Not for. About.

--
http://pcguyelevated.ytmnd.com/

[Back to original message]