Posted by Martin Heffels on 06/19/06 14:07

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:01:25 -0700, "Richard Crowley" <rcrowley@xpr7t.net>
wrote:

>"Bob A" wrote ...
>> LOL. It never ceases to amaze that the people that
>> acknowledge that they have NEVER even used LP
>> have so much to say about it!!
>
>Please cite a specific reference to someone who said
>that they have "never used it". You aren't by any chance
>confusing "never used it" with "don't use it anymore",
>or "never use it for serious work", are you?

I was of the category, seeing is believing, so I tried LP, but honestly,
not the thing to do for pro-work. Too risky. Just look at DVCAM with it's
higher tape-speed. It's done for a reason: reliabilty.
If someone wnats to take a risk of using LP, there own choice, but you
better spent a few dollars more on an extra tape, than half a day on
reshooting something you missed because of a few drop-outs because you shot
LP.

My opnion, take it, or leave it :-)

cheers

-martin-
--
"If he can he'll smile 'cos he's a Royal Crocodile."

Inviato da X-Privat.Org - Registrazione gratuita http://www.x-privat.org/join.php

[Back to original message]