Posted by Jesse on 06/23/06 06:30

NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> wrote in
news:_iflg.3910$aB6.32390@wagner.videotron.net:

> Jesse wrote:
>> NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> wrote in news:XBvkg.14544$Ra3.168951
>> @weber.videotron.net:
>>
>>> Jesse wrote:
>>>> NRen2k5 <napsterneorenegade@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>> news:ffXGf.1618$1U6.189164@weber.videotron.net:
>>>>
>>>>> Jesse wrote:
>>>>>> Joel <joelx@usa.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:temlu19jimua8m9c6rhfa8p2r7fmkcg6p1@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jesse <org@org.orgy> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> labicff@yahoo.com wrote in news:1126144848.104179.218880
>>>>>>>> @g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is it because the heardphones are not good enough as an antenna
>>>>>>>>> for am radio. I would like to record some am programs on a
>>>>>>>>> compact
>> mp3
>>>>>>>>> player.
>>>>>>>> No, it is because no one is stupid enough to design and market an
>> mp3
>>>>>>>> player just for you.
>>>>>>> But you are stupid enough to reply to five-month-old messages.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry Blow-All, it just so happens I have a life and don't come
>>>>>> here much more often than that .. With the notable exception of
>>>>>> today. Permit me to ANSWER WHAT THE FUCK I WANT WHEN I WANT TO AND
>>>>>> HOW I WANT TO TO WHOEVER THE FUCK I WANT TO .... If you don't mind.
>>
>>>>> Of course you can do that. And so can we. By calling you an asshole
>>>>> for instance.
>>>>>
>>>>> - NRen2k5
>>>>>
>>>> "We" ?
>>>> Someone die and make you official spokesperson here ?
>>> No. Did I ever imply that? No.
>>
>> Yes. You do know what "we" means, right ?
>>
>> We : Used by the speaker or writer to indicate the speaker or writer
>> along with another or others as the subject: We made it to the lecture
>> hall on time. We are planning a trip to Arizona this winter.
>> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/we
>>
>> So .. You and who else are you speaking for ?
>
> Not for. About.
>
Oh Ok Shit4Brains, I'll leave it at that.

[Back to original message]