Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 06/24/06 03:20

On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:17:01 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:

>On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:06:27 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:54:22 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>
>>>On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 04:26:49 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>>>> The HD content piped by a cable service is not true HD content.
>>>> They screw with it (compress).
>>>
>>>HD DVD discs "screw with it (compress)" too.
>>
>> You retarded fuck. The topic of that remark was about Off air HD
>> content being modified before being piped out by cable providers.
>
>In that case, you should've used to word "recompress," instead of compress.

Bullshit. The proper term for fucking up good content is
"reprocessed".

>However, you also used the term "true HD" to describe a compressed version
>of HD, namely OTA. I feel that's in error as well.

You're a goddamned idiot. Broadcast HDTV IS the ORIGINAL
implementation, dumbass.

When General Instrument made the encoder racks, that WAS and STILL IS
the exact array size, and content processing that was the original
design.

I don't care what you "feel".

Of course, there are "HD" channels that carry content that was
created or originally piped via 4:3 NTSC modes, and usually it looks
like shit in HD.

CSI, however looks EXACTLY as good via HDTV broadcast as the up
converted HD scanned DVD versions do off the HD DVD player.

Tight.

[Back to original message]