|
Posted by Jay G. on 06/24/06 12:17
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 03:22:58 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:17:08 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>
>>On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 06:11:38 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 21:38:02 -0500, "Jay G." <Jay@tmbg.org> Gave us:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>It's interesting to note that while Blu-Ray has 4 titles with a better
>>>>ranking than any HD DVD title, the top 10 HD DVD titles have a better
>>>>average sales ranking than the top 10 Blu-Ray titles. It looks like the
>>>>little dip in Blu-Ray sales over the past few days synce up with Amazon
>>>>slightly raising the price on average for Blu-Ray titles.
>>>
>>> That isn't a good analysis if you ask me. Amazon's price wouldn't
>>> be a factor.
>>
>>If price isn't a factor, then the price difference between the different
>>format players wouldn't be a factor either.
>>
>
> The price difference that was under discussion is near nil, as in
> likely than a dollar.
And yet there is a noticable drop in sales that correlates exactly to the
date that the average Blu-Ray price increased.
-Jay
[Back to original message]
|