Posted by jwb on 01/17/19 11:51

"SoHillsGuy" <jerrygref@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1151421935.896122.253540@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> jwb wrote:
>> "SoHillsGuy" <jerrygref@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > Add up the stars (880) and divide by total reviewers (391) for 2.25
>> > stars average.
>>
>> which they probably round up, since they don't seem to do "half stars"
>
>
> That's not true. Their site is covered with ratings that include
> fractional stars of all sizes.

didn't notice (or, I should say, I didn't bother to look before posting, and
was going by memory, which is obviously faulty). But yes, you are correct.

So yea, the original question is valid - why three stars for the movie,
then?

[Back to original message]