Reply to Re: Best reciever for FTA?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by kryppy on 10/12/05 03:57

On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:56:32 -0400, kryppy <kryppy@.> wrote:

>On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:41:55 -0700, "Skip" <strandbiker1@adelphia.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Glad I use my Fortec for FTA and not for Echostar.
>
>How is your picture quality with the Fortec?


OOOps. you already said it is fine.



>>"RED DEVIL" <manutd11@xxxbellsouth.net> wrote in message
>>news:uvjok1pvg08hb1hdideviqm68obocs1s3d@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:43:51 -0400, kryppy <kryppy@.> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 20:51:39 -0700, "Skip" <strandbiker1@adelphia.net>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>My fortec ultra works great. I did have a problem with the software
>>>>>getting
>>>>>corrupted, but I reloaded it and everything is fine. No lines in my TV.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Yeah, I wonder where the freetech coolsat shill went.
>>>>I guess even he knows his BS just don't pass the acid test ..
>>>>
>>> Not a shill, a Pansat and Coolsat owner. But then again this is not a
>>> echostar NG
>>
>

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"