Posted by Mr. Tapeguy on 06/30/06 07:59

>
> That question is best answered by the pros in rec.video.production. I
> suspect the GL2 _may_ suffice, but the reviews that I've seen of it aren't
> that good. Most "entry level wedding videographer" recommendations that
> I've seen have been for a PD-150/170 (or the prosumer equivalent, the
> VX2000/2100). Next up the ladder is the XL2, which offers the advantage of
> interchangeable lenses but, from what I understand, offers video quality
> comparable to the Sony offering. Sony's big advantage is extraordinary
> low-light capability -- I can shoot by candlelight with my VX2000 -- and,
> evidently, that makes it appealing to wedding videographers who have to
> shoot in dimly lit churches, at night, etc. I've honestly never seen the
> GL2 discussed in this context, though I suspect it probably wouldn't be too
> bad (though check its low-light capability). The GL1, on the other hand,
> from what I've seen is pretty bad.
>
>

Ah shaddap ya pompous blowhard ; >

Craig

http://www.pro-tape.com

[Back to original message]