Posted by JH on 07/04/06 17:19

On Sat, 1 Jul 2006 10:48:26 -1000, "NoNoBadDog!" <Diespammers@notme.com>
wrote:

>
>"Bob" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
>news:44a3c968.45928953@news-server.houston.rr.com...
>> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:09:16 -1000, "NoNoBadDog!"
>> <Diespammers@notme.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>I guess you don't know how to use Google.
>>
>>>>>*PLONK*
>>
>>>> Plonking in public is in bad taste and shows that you cannot tolerate
>>>> the opinions of others when they challenge yours.
>>
>>>There was no challenge of opinion. The OP couldn't figure out how to use
>>>Google. I have better things to do than do his homework.
>>
>> Fine - just ignore him. But don't plonk in public. No one wants to see
>> you throw a temper tantrum because you can't deal with your
>> frustrations.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Stop Repeat Offenders!
>> Don't Re-elect Them!
>
>1. There was no temper tantrum.
>2. You are the only person I have read that claims plonking is in bad
>taste.
>3. I have the right to plonk anytime, anywhere and in any fashion I see
>fit.
>4. You obsess about the strangest things...
>5. None of the above is a temper tantrum, either...
>
>Bobby
>

I think it is courtesy to inform someone he has been kill-filed.

J.

[Back to original message]