|
|
Posted by krft on 07/07/06 20:56
FatKat wrote:
> NRen2k5 wrote:
>> FatKat wrote:
>>> krft wrote:
>>>> FatKat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Forgive my ignorance (I really don't use it all that much) but
>>>>> isn't ShareAzza one of the many versions of EMule, in that they
>>>>> use the same
>>>>> networks? The SA client is much niftier than WinMX's, but it
>>>>> still takes forever to DL, and those that actually do download
>>>>> suddenly lose
>>>>> all their sources before completion.
>>>> Shareazza is supossedly using the same network, but I've got to
>>>> be
>>>> honest Emule, whilst sometimes slow does get there in the end,
>>>> whilst ShareAza never actually finishes a download. Recently
>>>> changed from Emule Plus to Emule Extreme & I can say that Extreme
>>>> certainly does perform, in that if you can find it you'll get it.
>>>
>>> There were several angry reviews about Extreme on CNet, so I
>>> figured
>>> I'd play it safe and go with original Emule. I'm happily
>>> surprised
>>> by the availability of files and DL speeds. Also, I have yet to
>>> see any increase in pop-ups or any signs of spyware...as of yet
>>> anyway.
>>
>> CNET isn't all that reliable.
>>
> I was referring to user reviews - there weren't that many, but they
> were pretty consistent. But if you've got better things to say
> about
> the program, I'd love to hear it.
Well I already have, I personally wouldn't use straight vanilla Emule
The 2 variations I have & do use are Emule plus & Emule Extreme & of
the 2 of those I favour Extreme. Let's just say it works & if the
Cnet readership don't like it, well that's another plus point...
[Back to original message]
|