Posted by :::Jerry:::: on 07/07/06 16:25

"Tony Morgan" <tonymorgan@rhylonlinenospam.com> wrote in message
news:o4YJPTEj0krEFw0Z@zen54488.zen.co.uk...
> In message <s5ydnaNaYsrMOzDZnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@hawaiiantel.net>,
> NoNoBadDog! <Diespammers@notme.com> writes
> >> What rubbish.
> >> The police are asking hunt monitors to video the hunt scum, to
get
> >> evidence of them illegally hunting.
> >> Of course it's admissible.
> >>
> >> Pete
> >>
> >Not according to any jurisdiction that I know of.
>
> Have a look at the Human Rights Act (1998) in the "exclusions"
clauses.
> Specifically "Acting for the prevention of disorder or crime.".
> >
> >Perhaps you have a legal precedent you would like to cite where
such a
> >video was used to convict anyone?
>
> It's there in the Statute.

Can people please note that people are talking at cross purposes
here, 'Pete' was talking about UK law, 'NoNoBadDog!' seems to be
talking about USA law, 'Tony Morgan' is talking about EU law....

[Back to original message]