Posted by NRen2k5 on 11/16/64 11:52

David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:
> "Laurence Payne" <lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom> wrote in message news:9nv3b29tg9crohphqbkd99pfgfdu9ouue4@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 13:42:20 -0700, Julian
>> <JulianPAdamsNo@SpamHotmail.Com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Like ANY other sound editor. Unfortunately, it will re-encode your
>>>> MP3's, which is a BAD THING.
>>> That's why to use MP3 Gain. It does NOT re-encode your MP3's. It
>>> only writes a volume play back level to the header which can be
>>> removed at any time.
>> Unfortunately that volume reduction is probably achieved digitally by
>> just throwing away bits, which is a bad thing.

It doesn't throw away bits. What it does is it changes "global gain"
values. Doing so is totally lossless and reversible.

> Anyway do you WANT
>> everything reduced to the level of the quietest? You then have to
>> apply more amplification, bringing noise levels up.

So?

And you don't have to reduce them to the level of the quietest. What you
can do is apply "track gain" so that all the songs are a certain volume,
for example 89dB, and then use "constant gain" to bring the volume of
every song up or down by the same amount.

> I had a look, and I can't see how the device works without modifying
> dynamic range - but even if it works by lowering... you have another
> valid 'yuk' point.

MP3Gain doesn't touch dynamic range.

--
http://pcguyelevated.ytmnd.com/

[Back to original message]