Posted by Laurence Payne on 07/11/06 19:37

On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 19:38:52 +0100, Tony Morgan
<tonymorgan@rhylonlinenospam.com> wrote:

>
>>Covert audio/video is admissible in English courts. Given
>>opportunity, the defence may well challenge its authenticity. But in
>>principle it's admissible, and it's often used.
>
>In which case what is your father's view of the Human Rights Act 1998 in
>the context being discussed ?


That covert evidence is sometimes challenged on the basis of the HRA,
but none the less frequently admitted.

I don't think being a Google-expert is enough here, Tony.

[Back to original message]