Posted by Martin Heffels on 07/12/06 00:37

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:19:36 GMT, Larry in AZ
<usenet2@DE.LETE.THISljvideo.com> wrote:

>????

That quote from the judge's ruling is a bit too loose to understand
properly for somebody for whom English is a second language :-)

I don't understand the fuzz. The mentioned Cleanflicks buys a legal
uncensored version, and packs this together with the censored version. It
looks like a popular thing the sale of family-safe edits.

Now because of this ruling, people won't start buying the uncensored
version, because they have no choice anymore of buying a censored version.
No, they won't buy these movies at all. So that means a loss in sales for
the studios. Didn't anyone consider that?

Maybe the studios should offer the censored versions themselves then. I
think it would be easy to set bits for a scene which tell whether there is
violent, nudity, drugs, whatever, and via parental-control you can set
which things you allow your children to watch, and automatically those
scenes are censored, based on the parental settings.
If this technique is introduced, remeber, I am the inventor of it :-D

cheers

-martin-
--
"I'm full of dust and guitars." - Syd Barrett
11/07/06 The Crazy Diamond is now a star in heaven

[Back to original message]