Posted by Anne R on 07/12/06 22:56

On 10 Jul 2006, NoNoBadDog!<Diespammers@notme.com> wrote:

> "Anne R" <no@nomail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97FBF157EDF215D4AM2@127.0.0.1...
>> On 02 Jul 2006, NoNoBadDog!<Diespammers@notme.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Anne R" <no@nomail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns97F3C793C66874C1H4@127.0.0.1...
>>>> [...]
>>>
>>> You are wasting your time. Any video you take without the
>>> doctors knowledge will *NOT* be admissible as evidence in court.
>>> In order to do so, the videotaping would have to be ordered by a
>>> district court judge, would have to be accomplished by trained
>>> personnel, and the video would have to be maintained in law
>>> enforcements hands at all times to insure that the video had not
>>> been altered.
>>>
>>
>> It is not necessary for the video evidence to be used in a civil
>> action in the courts.
>>
>> I do not expect it to go so far.
>
> Then what purpose would it serve?


I could show the hospital internal management what is happening.

The management could then mount their own investigation secure in the
knowledge that if they looked hard enough they would find for
themselves what I had demonstrated to them.

I will have shown them an undesirable end-point. I leave it to them
to find how to get from the beginning to an end-point which they will
know exists.

That is quite different to the management mounting an investigation
but uncertain that the allegation made is true or false.

[Back to original message]