Reply to Re: "Superman Returns"; *I* barf up stuff I ate 5 years ago

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Mike Dobony on 07/15/06 21:40

"HellPopeHuey" <HellPopeHuey@Boom.net> wrote in message
news:%G7ug.66332$fb2.52045@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
>
> I went to see that damned movie and PHEWWEEEE! what a stench. The
> acting is about as good as you could ask for, the effects are
> outstanding and the soundtrack was a cut above.
>
> However, the whole thing reeks of sniveling, emo-band breast-beating.
> There's no damned humor in it, a gross oversight and its essentially a
> giant chick-flick with none of the endearing attributes that rescue a
> certain number of them from terminal insipidity. Aside from the
> all-too-few super-power scenes, which do rock, its a buncha longing
> looks, melodramatic shticks and retreaded, RETARDED classic Superman
> sayings reworked so as not to offend the politically-correct
> puckerbutts. Its almost like Goethe's "The Sorrows of Young Werther" in
> red and blue tights.
>
> One of the biggest stinks is several visuals and bits of dialogue that
> are a revolting sop to the Christian crowd that keeps pressing us all
> forward into dynamic mediocrity. Its SUPERMAN, NOT FUCKING DAMNED JESUS.

Forgot to mention that the Christian-friendly "mediocrity" brings in more
money at the box office! The more restrictive the rating, the more totally
unnecessary references to sex, and more gutter talk equals less profit for
stockholders.

Mike D.

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"