Posted by doc on 07/16/06 17:07

AMEN! I liked QT on my first digital camera and that worked well on my PC.
When we started reading, using, editing, and outputing in QT my attitude
changed completely. Moreover, as the evolution of QT has ondated itself,
something happened in the streaming and thus that's where things went sour .
.. the missing link (the one that makes the video work all the time) and as
I've stated before we're not the only one that has the problem but perhaps
the only with the balls to say that it wasn't working on our Mac's (notice
the past tense of the verb "was" cause we got rid of the mac's but still
have problems with the QT vid links on occassion - not always - just some)
and "yes" we have the most current download (other than the BUY one that
pops up EVERY TIME we open the stupid FREE player)

DrD

"Rick Merrill" <rick0.merrill@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
news:1eWdnUrDQpnSYAbZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@comcast.com...
> William Davis wrote:
>>...
>> The QT codec is robust, completely stable, constantly evolving,
>
> the oxymoron of the day ;-)
>
> (true but the words contract each other like 'jumbo shrimp')

[Back to original message]