Reply to Re: "Superman Returns"; *I* barf up stuff I ate 5 years ago

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Alric Knebel on 07/17/06 04:01

Phat Bytestard wrote:

> On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:17:31 -0500, Alric Knebel
> <alric@[cableone.net]> Gave us:
>
>
>>Phat Bytestard wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:01:20 -0500, Alric Knebel
>>><alric@[cableone.net]> Gave us:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I just
>>>>laid it out to you. I'm not alone. We're the future, my friend. We're
>>>>what human beings SHOULD be.
>>>
>>>
>>> I love how there are so many folks out there that have all the right
>>>answers for you... even to the point that they even think themselves
>>>better than the rest.
>>>
>>> I know street corner bums with better character, and far more honor.
>>
>>Do you?
>
>
> Yes. Mostly Vietnam era veterans that asswipes not unlike yourself
> have neglected.

Oh, oh. Here we go. "My country, right or wrong." I'm sorry, John
Wayne, but I don't subscribe to that idea. When your country tells you
to go somewhere to shoot someone for reasons they're not being
forthcoming with, it's your moral obligation to ask why. If you're not
brave enough to ask why, you can go on along and you'll be forgiven for
your cowardice. But don't pass off your acquiescence as a high ideal.
In a democracy or a republic, we don't serve the government; the
government serves US. We are therefore responsible for its decisions.

>
>> Let me share this with you, you stupid asshole.
>
> You sure get mift when someone tweaks a nerve, eh? Hahahaha!

Not really. This is sport. You're just a slow fish in a barrel. Hahahaha!

>> By stating
>>my point of view, I'm asserting MY values in the world.
>
> Assert them on yourself, dufus.

When you will, I will, gasbag.

>> Did the other
>>asshole not assert that HIS view was somehow better, and made people
>>like him morally superior to the rest? Did he not? I merely stated
>>openly what he tacitly implied. And I stand by it. Right away, you
>>doltish turd, you impugn my honor when I've shown myself quite
>>honorable.
>
>
> No, you did not. You remarked about how you are an example of what
> a human should be. Right there, you commit the character flaw. As
> for the honor thing, you are making a fine example of how your cup
> isn't quite so full with this very post you have made. Oooops.

You're too thick to understand what I said. Character requires that you
discern for yourself your own values based on personal experience. You
don't absorb values like a dumb sponge, when someone squeezes you.

> Your problem with me isn't that I don't have honor; it's
>>that my values are different than your own, and because I thought them
>>out myself, I can defend them better.
>
>
> No, you obviously cannot, having made such a remark, then following
> it up with this tripe.

Tripe how? I defended it, and I explained it. That you can't
understanding it is a reflection on YOU, not me.

>> At this point, you're just some
>>stuttering fool who realized I just pulled the rug from under you.>
>
> Calling folks a fool is another, more serious character flaw.
> Thinking that you "pulled the rug" from under someone is an even more
> severe character flaw still. Were you a bully in primary school or
> are you still in primary school?

What the hell are you talking about, you asshole? Did you not insert
your unasked-for opinion in a thread that had nothing to do with you?
Gosh, dufus, think this through.

>>As for honor, how about honesty?
>
> What?

Duh.

>> You don't have enough of either to use
>>your own name, or the imagination to make one up from scratch, and
>>instead fall back stupidly on the paronomasia of a silly pop culture
>>icon.
>
>
> There is no other person with this name, you stupid bat's turd.
> Also, what makes you think I would give actual contact information in
> a forum mostly full of total dweebs like you?

You're an idiot. Use your own name, shit-for-brains. I use MY own name
while it's populated by idiots like YOU. I find it hard to take
seriously someone who names himself "Phat Bytestard." That's cute.

> Usenet is an anonymous, free speech forum. If you are unaware of
> that fact then perhaps the word for today for you is "interloper".

Here's one for you: HOMUNCULUS. "Cretin" is another.
--

______________________________________________
Alric Knebel
http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html
http://www.ironeyefortress.com

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"