Posted by Richard Crowley on 07/23/06 23:25

"Martin Heffels" <spamalam@worldhello.com> wrote in message
news:fm08c29q3guojbs9qv09ur2q6l8aeilr36@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:10:22 -0700, "Richard Crowley"
> <rcrowley@xpr7t.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Non-response noted.
>
> You have claimed to support the notion that when for instance creating
> DVD's, 35mm-to-DVD will look better than VHS-to-DVD.
> The same rule applies to acquisition. If you record the signal of a
> higher
> quality camera (like the HVR-Z1x) with a better lens, and a higher
> resolution sensor to mini-DV, the quality will be better than
> recording
> with a mini-DV camera (like the DVX100b).
> You know this rule as well, mr Crowley, but since you have decided to
> give
> me a silly treat, I better type it out for you. Disappointing sir!

You are making the assumption that HDV cameras
are "higher quality" just because they make a wider
picture?

[Back to original message]