Posted by Greg Cisko on 07/31/06 02:08

"Andrew Rossmann" <andysnewsreply@no_junk.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.1f36750a66650bfe989813@newsgroups.comcast.net...
>> I never did look for reviews on the DVD-V2000 and it is fine so
>> I am tempted to take a chance on the DVD-V9650. But I thought
>> I would check here first to see if anyone will tell me that would
>> be a horrible mistake. Or better yet suggest *THE* unit to get.
>
> Upconverting DVD to HD is a joke. Increasing resolution from a low-res
> source just involves guessing what the extra pixels should be. It
> doesn't add any real information.

Thanks for the reply. But I was not really interested in editorial
comment on the validity of HDMI. I have seen it myself and
find it acceptable. So whether HDMI is a joke in your humble
opinion (or not) was not part of the info I am seeking advice on.
Thanks anyway though.

> Unless there is something wrong with your older combo, I would hold onto
> it until the BluRay/HD-DVD war settles down.

Maybe not interested in this as I have no interest in repurchasing
my DVD's in some HD format. At least at the moment :-)


--

gcisko@hotmail.com

[Back to original message]