Posted by RIAA Rulez on 08/06/06 08:52

"CMR" <crazymanrobert@comcast.net> wrote in
news:3rKdne9jsqA6PEjZnZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@comcast.com:

>
> "RIAA Rulez" <yeyriaa@riaarulez.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9817234634missnwitham@81.174.50.80...
>> "Patient Zero 2.0 ...Prophet of Dugganomics" <noonan24_7@hotmail.com>
>> wrote in news:pngBg.2216$Lh4.1020@trnddc02:
>>
>>> Both Demolition and my psychic call girl Ginger told me about
>>> them...
>>
>> Yeah, they're "douchebags" because they don't want their member
>> companies' products being traded for free.
>>
>> Why don't you work for free, douchebag?
>>
>>> Criticism
>>> Critics of the RIAA have claimed that the RIAA's attacks against the
>>> sharing of music files has failed to stop the sharing or protect
>>> their sales.
>>
>> Yeah, RIGHT. The fact is, it's much harder for the average person to
>> illegally trade music than it was in Napster's heyday. Doesn't matter
>> if a technically-inclined minority can still do it with ease.
>>
>>> They note the increase in CD sales during the Napster era and
>>> the subsequent decrease during the RIAA's crackdown on peer-to-peer
>>> network users[citation needed]
>>
>> [citation needed]? Oh, this is some Wikipedia garbage.
>>
>> No need to read further, the source is worthless.
>
> well with your point being made, They are assholes. Think about it.
> They are going after companies and others are are LEGALLY getting
> music by paying for it. I have limewire. I pay for the pro. I
> download freeware applications and shareware of stuff I need instead
> of searching all over the damn net. Because I have limewire and I
> have music, I was contacted by one of the companies cause they saw I
> searched for ac/dc. I proved to them that I only searched and had not
> downloaded as I wanted to know a name of a song. I get all my stuff
> legally through rhapsody. I get coupons a lot to download free music
> instead of paying 99cents or whatever they are charging. I don't know
> cause i get the coupons that give 1 to 2 downloads for free or I drink
> pepsi to get free music. They backed off. How long until they go to
> sue Pepsi or Rhapsody for selling music cheap? If sales are down. . .
> why don't they blame the artists? Music today sucks ball sacks.
> Theres maybe 1 song I like from various artists and I am not gonna pay
> 20 bucks for a cd when I can either pay a dollar for a pepsi or wait
> for rhapsody to send me a coupon to get the song for free?

There are plenty of good bands out there. The real problem is the
scumsucking pirates who have ruined it for everyone. They've made it so
that the music industry can't afford to take risks, and all the only
things that get the marketing push are the bubblegum proven-sellers.

Limewire is a wretched hive of scum and villainy and anyone who defends
it as a legitimate service is probably a thief.

[Back to original message]