Posted by Temsonic on 08/07/06 22:46

"POD {ҿ�}" <DONT.EVEN.TRY.IT@DEADSPAM.COM> wrote in message
news:Xns9818A72E73D4AWeLovePOD@212.23.3.119...
> "porky" <news@dvdlibrary.co.uk> once tried to test me. I ate their liver
> with some fava beans and a nice chianti
>
>> Looks like bluray is not quite the holy grail that we were led to
>> believe. It's lacklustre launch passed quite unnoticed after all the
>> hype, nothing like the scale of enthusiasm or take-up of HD-DVD. The
>> Samsung Blu-Ray player got a crap review in HCC issue133.
>> thanks
>> HD-DVD UK
>>
>>
>
> It's the Department of Mis-information again!!! You still peddling your
> made-up shite? "Porky" is a very suitable name...since you keep
> tellin' 'em!
>
> The lengths these sad bastards go to to try and defeat the superior
> format. Don't here you coming on here publicing the fact that Warner
> Bros are no longer "Exclusively" HD-DVD do we?? The fact that one of
> the biggest producers of home video have taken a step back from your
> beloved format must hurt... ;-)
>
> Now fuck off and rot in hell for spouting fabricated bile.


The OP's constant anti-Bluray spamming is tiresome, but everything I've read
has in fact pointed to Bluray so far failing to live up to its potential and
not being a patch on the HD-DVD releases. I must admit that the majority of
my info on this comes via www.dvdtimes.co.uk - I'm not aware that they have
any reason to support one format over the other, and generally trust what
they have to say. If you have any links to reviews which state the opposite,
please post them. I'd like to try and get a balanced view if it's there to
be had.

[Back to original message]