Posted by Bob on 08/09/06 13:20

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:59:01 -0500, Justin <nospam@insightbb.com>
wrote:

>>>> But do try again, this time with a rational comment - assuming you are
>>>> capable of such things.

>>>It's only rational if you think theft is legal.

>> You are not rational, therefore you are not qualified to make such
>> pronouncements.
>> And one thing is for certain, I have no intentions of letting some
>> leftist queer tell me how I must interpret the matter. Now go crawl
>> back up your boyfriend's ass where you belong before you stink the
>> place up.

>I stand by original statement. You're a deluded, self important ignorant
>fucking idiot.

Ad hom.

You lose.

If you can't make your case rationally, then you are irrelevant to the
discussion.

For those who may not be aware, the issue of private use of video and
audio entertainment has not been settled by Congress. Only Congress
can make binding laws. The current laws permit Fair Use. Just because
some judge thinks otherwise does not make it a binding law.

Dio you want the judiciary to make the laws? They are unelected so
they do not represent your interests as citizens. They only represent
those special interests who support their position as judicial
advocates. Do you really want a fascist dictatorship?

For more see EPIC. This issue is not going away. The last time
Congress made a law about it, the laws came down 100% for citizens.

http://www.epic.org/


--

Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!

[Back to original message]