Posted by Martin Heffels on 09/07/06 11:51

On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:24:24 +0100, mv@movingvision.co.uk wrote:

>For example the 1/3" Super HAD 16x9 CCD's on a Z1 are as good or better in most respects to the 2/3rd inch CCD's on BVW 300 and maybe even a 400.

That may be the case, but, imager-size is also important in relation to the
depth-of-field, so there are more reasons to choose for the one or the
other.

cheers

-martin-
--
"I have no fear of losing my life. If I have to save a koala or a crocodile
or a kangaroo or a snake, mate, I will save it."

Farewell Stevo!

[Back to original message]