Posted by Quanta on 09/23/06 03:33
"Ed Light" <nobody@nobody.there> wrote in message
news:VQ1Rg.278$La2.221@fed1read08...
>
> "Jukka Aho" <jukka.aho@iki.fi> wrote in message
> news:%E1Rg.18136$DE1.1192@reader1.news.jippii.net...
>> Quanta wrote:
>>
>>>>> I have seen absolutely no 'standard' gammas like you claim.
>>>>> Enlighten me.
>>
>>>> <http://google.com/search?q=mac+pc+gamma>
>>>> <http://google.com/groups?q=mac+pc+gamma>
>>>>
>>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_correction#PC.2C_Ma
>>>> c.2C_and_sRGB_standard_gammas>
>>
>>> Averages? Do you know statistics?
>>
>> I have no idea what you're going on about and why, but it seems like
>> you're looking for an argument. You'll get none from me; I merely
>> provided you with the basic information you requested, and I think I'll
>> leave it at that.
>
> I'm really feeling like he's trolling. So I'll be ignoring him too.
>
> --
> Ed Light
>
> Smiley :-/
> MS Smiley :-\
>
> Send spam to the FTC at
> spam@uce.gov
> Thanks, robots.
>
> Bring the Troops Home:
> http://bringthemhomenow.org
>
>
>
Or perhaps you think these sources of information apply to LCD and Plasma
screens? LOL
[Back to original message]
|