Posted by Smarty on 01/11/70 11:59

Thanks Martin. Yes, it was indeed Richard Crowley who replied to my original
post, raised the terminology question, and dismissed the comment as being
stale since "they have been at this for several years". I would love to see
proof of that statement.

Smarty



"Martin Heffels" <feipbjszfo@oxeszdjnlp.xercdpvueppjtmougcqvtz.net> wrote in
message news:v7elh2lg8p2obk8mfukmn8444kegnsaroa@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:45:51 -0400, "Smarty" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote:
>
>>Martin,
>>
>>I didn't start the "camcorder" terminology discussion. I did, however,
>>need
>>to react when the nitpicking of words began.
>
> I believe you meant:
>
>>"Richard Crowley" <rcrowley@xpr7t.net> wrote in message
>
> and not me :-)
>
> -m- (don't worry, all forgiven)
> --
> "Every picture defines its own look, and that definition begins with the
> director's intentions for the script ... I have Ingmar Bergman to thank
> for letting me experiment with a kind of cinematography that utilizes
> true light where possible. ... He was intensely interested in light and
> how it can be applied to create a given atmosphere."
> - Sven Nykvist, passed away 20-9-2006
>
> Farewell Sven. You are a great inspiration. May you guide our lights
> from heaven!

[Back to original message]