Posted by NRen2k5 on 10/01/06 13:35

Jalecks wrote:
> "Chris H. of Portland, OR" <chrispdx@comcast.FUCKOFFSPAMMERS.net> wrote
> in news:6-WdnUgdH-cX7ofYnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>> "ViNNY" <vinny@noemail.org> wrote in message
>> news:U82dnY_mlq658ofYnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>> Reports from the Tokyo Game Show indicate that PS3 games will be $100
>>> each.
>> And they'll be unrentable, since the disc technology will be "once you
>> run it on your PS3, it can't be run on another system".
>
> You'd better get used to digital rights management technology. Sony's is
> the only game console burdened with it because the PS3 is the only true
> console using next-gen technology.
>
> I seriously doubt PS3 discs will be unavailable for rental, BTW. DRM is
> all about secure information rental.
>
>> Sony is slitting their own throats.
>
> This is the future, whether consumers accept it or not. The MPAA and RIAA
> have worked with every major software and electronics manufacturer to
> ensure that the next generation of media will be totally locked down.
> There will be no alternatives. OS X and Vista have low-level DRM layers.
> Even the Open Source community is embracing it with Linux and the GPL
> moving towards DRM support.
>
> If DRM hurts Sony, it wasn't Sony's fault. Try blaming the criminal
> pirates that caused the situation instead. If it weren't for Napster,
> this situation wouldn't exist.

You are so ignorant it is pathetic. I will sooner kill or die than give
up my fair use rights.

[Back to original message]