Posted by Justin on 10/08/06 20:57

Anybody wrote on [Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:20:32 +1300]:
> In article <slrneiidh7.mi7.nospam@debian.dns2go.com>, Justin
> <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
>
>> Anybody wrote on [Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:32:03 +1300]:
>> > In article <9_KdnS5u0KJdybXYnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@got.net>, "Odinn"
>> > <odinn_storm@fastmail.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Pay special attention to the last line of the story!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2006-10-06-castle-hughes-pregnant_x.htm?
>> >> csp=27
>> >
>> > And she's only 16 years old too ... looks like yet another child actor
>> > is going strange under the pressure. :-\
>>
>> It's so strange for 16 year olds to fuck.
>
> Depends on your definition of "strange".
>
> If you mean "rare" than unfortunately it's no where near as rare as it
> should be. You can thank moronic "role models" like Britney Spears and
> the over-abundance of soft-porn in entertainment these days for that.
>
> If you mean "idiotic", then yes it is idiotic, especially when a girl
> of 16 ends up with a baby ... babies should not be having babies of
> their own. It's usually a sign of something wrong in either their
> ubringing or their mental health.

For most of history it was the NORM for girls of 14-16 to have children.

[Back to original message]