Posted by Justin on 10/09/06 00:30

Anybody wrote on [Mon, 09 Oct 2006 13:01:05 +1300]:
> In article <slrneiipi7.mi7.nospam@debian.dns2go.com>, Justin
> <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
>
>> Anybody wrote on [Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:20:32 +1300]:
>> > In article <slrneiidh7.mi7.nospam@debian.dns2go.com>, Justin
>> > <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Anybody wrote on [Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:32:03 +1300]:
>> >> > In article <9_KdnS5u0KJdybXYnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@got.net>, "Odinn"
>> >> > <odinn_storm@fastmail.net> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Pay special attention to the last line of the story!
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2006-10-06-castle-hughes-pregnant_x.
>> >> >> htm?
>> >> >> csp=27
>> >> >
>> >> > And she's only 16 years old too ... looks like yet another child actor
>> >> > is going strange under the pressure. :-\
>> >>
>> >> It's so strange for 16 year olds to fuck.
>> >
>> > Depends on your definition of "strange".
>> >
>> > If you mean "rare" than unfortunately it's no where near as rare as it
>> > should be. You can thank moronic "role models" like Britney Spears and
>> > the over-abundance of soft-porn in entertainment these days for that.
>> >
>> > If you mean "idiotic", then yes it is idiotic, especially when a girl
>> > of 16 ends up with a baby ... babies should not be having babies of
>> > their own. It's usually a sign of something wrong in either their
>> > ubringing or their mental health.
>>
>> For most of history it was the NORM for girls of 14-16 to have children.
>
> True, but that doesn't mean it was or is sensible or the "right thing".
>
> In many places 16 isn't considered old enough to drink alcohol, vote,
> drive a car, or have sex ... it can't even remotely be considered a
> sensible age to have a baby or raise a child.

With a lot of people 26 is too young to be sensible enough to procreate.

[Back to original message]