Posted by GMAN on 10/09/06 06:34

In article <slrneiipi7.mi7.nospam@debian.dns2go.com>, Justin <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
>Anybody wrote on [Mon, 09 Oct 2006 09:20:32 +1300]:
>> In article <slrneiidh7.mi7.nospam@debian.dns2go.com>, Justin
>> <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Anybody wrote on [Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:32:03 +1300]:
>>> > In article <9_KdnS5u0KJdybXYnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@got.net>, "Odinn"
>>> > <odinn_storm@fastmail.net> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Pay special attention to the last line of the story!
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
> http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2006-10-06-castle-hughes-pregnant_x.htm?
>>> >> csp=27
>>> >
>>> > And she's only 16 years old too ... looks like yet another child actor
>>> > is going strange under the pressure. :-\
>>>
>>> It's so strange for 16 year olds to fuck.
>>
>> Depends on your definition of "strange".
>>
>> If you mean "rare" than unfortunately it's no where near as rare as it
>> should be. You can thank moronic "role models" like Britney Spears and
>> the over-abundance of soft-porn in entertainment these days for that.
>>
>> If you mean "idiotic", then yes it is idiotic, especially when a girl
>> of 16 ends up with a baby ... babies should not be having babies of
>> their own. It's usually a sign of something wrong in either their
>> ubringing or their mental health.
>
>For most of history it was the NORM for girls of 14-16 to have children.

Maybe back when the life expectancy of humans was in the 30 - 40 year old
range.

[Back to original message]