Posted by Marcus Redd on 10/09/06 13:39

"Richard Brooks" <richardbrooks@vickers-supermarine.com> wrote in message
news:RM2dnVn-NvkM07fYRVnyjw@bt.com...
> Marcus Redd said the following on 09/10/06 14:14:
>> "Sanddancer" <Sanddancer@no.no> wrote in message
>> news:3mbki21i78mmefm9s32nvpa1ehee12mfaq@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:03:38 +0100, Gareth Halfacree
>>> <usenet@halfacree.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sanddancer wrote:
>>>>> On the subject of your site. I really don't read much into that orb
>>>>> thing. otherwise my house must be uncredibly haunted. I could do with
>>>>> a poltergeist to tidy up my mess mind. It took me just 4 shots to get
>>>>> this large orb while looking at your website:
>>>>> http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/2035/orbdz4.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> I've had similar results for years with 2 different digital cameras.
>>>> And you will for many more years, with many more cameras (digital and
>>>> otherwise). It's dust motes in the air. *All* 'orb' photographs are
>>>> dust motes in the air being magnified by the way the camera lens bends
>>>> light.
>>>>
>>>> All, that is, except 'chains of orbs'. They're not ghosts either;
>>>> they're the wriststrap of the camera dangling in front of the lens and
>>>> being illuminated by the flash.
>>>>
>>>> (Yes, I *know* you know what the orbs are. This post is for the
>>>> benefit
>>>> of anyone who might be thinking "Woo, ghost evidence!!!111eleventyone)
>>> That's what I've always thought it was. I'm suprised how often they
>>> pop up though as 'evidence' of ghosts.
>>
>> Don't be surprised. To quote somebody - "You believe what you want to
>> believe."
>
> I love the quote by Brian Sewell with regards to religion "it could be
> true, it must be true, it is true!"

Hehe...

[Back to original message]