Reply to Re: IMHO, Digital SECAM video is better than Analog NTSC video

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by ThePunisher on 10/09/06 19:13

"David McCall" <david_____@techshop.net> wrote in message
news:1etWg.2522$YD.1622@trndny09
> "jd" <jd@syd.net> wrote in message
> news:b5lki2dpfclke1lp9t5pk0mnifiv7ifd9i@4ax.com...
> > On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 23:26:41 -0700, JoeBloe
> > <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On 8 Oct 2006 17:25:49 -0700, "Radium" <glucegen1@excite.com>
> > > Gave us:
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Radium
> > >
> > >
> > > Fucking snip already!
> > >
> > > Who watches NTSC anymore? Bwuahahahahahah!
> >
> >
> > Stupid Americans and Japs do. They are behind the rest of the
> > world.
> Yeah, but those other slow countries have to wait around for a 25th
> of a second
> to see a full frame, we can see it in a mere 30th of a second
> with smoother motion as an extra benifit. :-)
>
> David

Repeating frames makes smoother motion, hahahahah!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ntsc#Framerate_conversion

--
ThePunisher

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"