Posted by JoeBloe on 10/12/06 03:32

On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:42:48 +0100, Roderick Stewart
<escapetime@removethisbit.beeb.net> Gave us:

>On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:55:32 -0400, "Joshua Zyber"
><joshzyber@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>What it comes down to is very simple. Neither PAL nor NTSC is perfect.
>>Both have compromises. Viewers raised watching PAL material since
>>childhood tend not to be bothered by the 4% speedup but are very
>>irritated by 3:2 pulldown. Likewise, viewers raised watching NTSC
>>material since childhood tend not to be bothered by 3:2 pulldown but are
>>very irritated by PAL speedup.
>>
>>This is why both formats should be abandoned as quickly as possible so
>>that true High Definition can finally take over.
>
>And what frame rate will "true" high definition have in order to be
>universally compatible?
>
>24fps to be compatible with the cinema? 25fps to be compatible with
>European television? 30fps to be compatible with American television?
>
>Rod.


Idiot. "true high definition requires new monitor devices. You
won't see it on your crap monitors, nor will we on a NTSC monitor.

Can you really be that clueless?

Oh that's right... your name says it all!

[Back to original message]