Reply to Re: IMHO, Digital SECAM video is better than Analog NTSC video

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by JoeBloe on 10/12/06 03:54

On 11 Oct 2006 20:48:56 +0200, Martin Heffels
<feipbjszfo@oxeszdjnlp.xercdpvueppjtmougcqvtz.net> Gave us:

>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:58:58 -0700, JoeBloe
><joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
>
>> Bingo! The only "flicker" that is reduced is lamp/shutter flicker.
>
>Not really. With a shorter shutter-time, you would only show a shorter part
>of the sinus-cycle of the AC-voltage. The idea of projecting the same image
>2 or 3 times, is to reduce the image-flicker, by updating the image on the
>retina more often. Optical illusion, so to speak.
>


Same frame three times over.... same retinal image, dope ass.

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"