Reply to Re: IMHO, Digital SECAM video is better than Analog NTSC video

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by JoeBloe on 10/12/06 03:28

On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:34:37 +0100, Roderick Stewart
<escapetime@removethisbit.beeb.net> Gave us:

>On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:05:00 +1000, rob <rob@nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>>>Big deal. One hardly notices the longer running time. PAL is still
>>>>superior to NTSC in every way.
>>>
>>>
>>> You fucking know NOTHING retard. 4% faster would yield a SHORTER
>>>running time. D'OH!
>>>
>>>
>>> It is always amusing to catch a know nothing twit that merely posts
>>>peanut gallery comments based on brainless assumptions.
>>>
>>> Especially when his mistake is so stupid as that of inverting the
>>>math!
>>>
>>> Hahahahaha! Good one, asswipe!
>>
>>Go wipe that shit off your face dogbreath. The OP was talking about
>>the LONGER RUNNING TIME OF NTSC you TERMINAL FUCKHEAD
>>
>>HAHAHAHA to you, COCK HEAD
>
>Ah, I see an amiably conducted well-reasoned debate between
>intelligent rational-minded adults has sprung up again. Points of view
>expressed in such a manner really deserve everyone's fullest
>consideration, don't they.
>
>Rod.


Just about as much as some twit on Usenet with the same name as an
famous entertainer.

Either your an idiot, if it is a mere nym, or your parents are, or
both. Good job, dipshit.

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"