Reply to Re: IMHO, Digital SECAM video is better than Analog NTSC video

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by JoeBloe on 10/12/06 23:22

On 12 Oct 2006 20:59:50 +0200, Martin Heffels
<feipbjszfo@oxeszdjnlp.xercdpvueppjtmougcqvtz.net> Gave us:

>On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:23:00 GMT, "David McCall" <david_____@techshop.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Film gets by using a 3 bladed shutter (sometimes only 2) to boost the
>>flicker rate,
>>and by bluring the crap out of any motion in the scene to get by at 24P.
>
>Elaborate a bit on this one David. A shorter shutter-time reduces the
>motion-blur. But motion-blur which is already introduced at the recording
>(24 fps), can not be removed, and with a shoerter shutter-time, certainly
>not extended.
>

You got a point! Score one for the martini! Hell, it was a free
throw though.

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"