Posted by chris66 on 10/20/06 12:23

Thanks Paul that sounds like it has everything Im after, I will pop
down to Victoria the weekend.

cheers


the dog from that film you saw wrote:
> "P Pron" <paulatspambegone.pron@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:4pq656Fk06goU1@individual.net...
>
>
> > || just get something with a digital video output - all the upscaling
> > || talk is crap - your tv does that itself anyway - it's the digital
> > || connection that improves the picture.
> > ||
> >
> > Your repeatedly saying this doesn't make it true....
> >
> > I recently bought a Sony DVP-NS76H - recommended by Mr Tomassi - to go
> > with my new Sony
> > Bravia KDL40S2010 LCD tv, and whether it is digital connection
> > vs.analogue, or the fact that there's a bay tree outside my window,
> > there's absolutely no doubt that the picture appears substantially better
> > using the player's built-in upscaling than that in the TV. It may be an
> > illusion, but if it is, it's an illusion that everyone who has seen it has
> > been fooled by.
> > I think the player was £90, multi-region, from Hi-Fi Confidential nr
> > Victoria Station, and I recommend it as strongly as Rolo did.
>
>
>
> when you say that, i guess you're saying it looks better when you tell the
> player to output a progressive signal rather than interlaced - think that
> might have something to do with it too ?
>
> remember - you can't invent extra detail that simply doesnt exist - you
> could use a pc to upscale to a fantastic resolution of... say 3800x2040 if
> you have a good quality large monitor- it still wouldnt offer any new
> information.
>
>
>
> --
> Gareth.
> A french man who wanted a castle threw his cat into a pond.
> http://www.audioscrobbler.com/user/dsbmusic/

[Back to original message]