Posted by Morton Davis on 10/30/06 01:52

"DB_Story" <DB_Story@att.net> wrote in message
news:x-ydnV-f5Y41h9jYnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com> wrote in message
> news:AY10h.209956$FQ1.167180@attbi_s71...
> >
> > "DB_Story" <DB_Story@att.net> wrote in message
> > news:zvmdnWSwqKGDt93YnZ2dnUVZ_r6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> > > Would be a nice feature of the new patch if it didn't let people with
> the
> > 0
> > > Files Hack connect to the network. That's not what MX is all about.
> They
> > > say they're keeping out the fakes now, so why not the worst of the
> > leechers
> > > as well?
> > >
> > When I first got WinMx I had ZERO files to share. AS soon as I started
> > getting files, I shared them. It's people like YOU who should be blocked
> > from the network. If it were in your control the network would be
> worthless.
>
> Boy, Morton, aren't you nasty today. And for not even knowing what you're
> talking about either.
>
> First, the Zero Files Hack prevents anyone from automatically uploading
even
> when the person has files they claim to be sharing, and no one else is
> uploading at all. They're not sharing, just teasing.
>
> Second, everyone who owns even one CD has files to share since they can
rip
> that CD to their share directory with free software and offer it in return
> for what they're seeking for themselves. That makes everyone richer.
>
Many people have no idea how to rip a CD. I'm one of them. Don't know. Don't
care.. I talk to peopple all the time who think WinMx is dead who used to be
on the network.

> If it were in my control, intentional lechers wouldn't be part of the
> network That would hardly make it worthless. Some people might even
> consider that a benefit.
>
Jusdge, jury and executioner, eh?

[Back to original message]