Posted by David Levy on 12/20/05 02:19

NunYa Bidness wrote:

> Note where he said LARGE sets. That would likely not include
> the "you can get a TV at WalMart for $70" model. It would not
> be in the LARGE category.

....which is why I noted the fact that his original statement contained
no such qualifier, and asked if he wished to amend it.


> Knowing anything at all about the prices though, one would
> think that you would have known that answer, and didn't really
> need to ask the question.

Knowing anything at all about how to read a Usenet thread, one would
think that you'd be able to follow a simple discussion.


> > > How does it deal with DTS without having a DTS decoder
> > > (none do, because they don't need it for OTA)?

> > I'm not an audiophile, but I assume that there's some
> > theoretical inherent advantage to using digital audio inputs.

> It is required for DTS AFAIK.

You really *don't* know how to follow a thread, do you?


> > Many consumers are loyal to a particular electronics brand.
> > Others might deliberately buy a relatively inexpensive
> > digital camera that uses the same type of flash memory as
> > their expensive TV display.

> Brand centricity is not always the best, nor most economical
> way to shop for or build one's home electronics gear set.

Nor did I claim otherwise.


> The specs TV makers quote usually are for what the inputs to
> the device will accept. It doesn't necessarily mean that it
> gets displayed the same way it gets received. One would have
> to examine the wording of the spec, OR the actual technical
> data sheet for the product.

Please see my other new reply (assuming that you can find it).

[Back to original message]