Posted by Richard Crowley on 11/01/06 22:47

"carlmart" wrote ...
> Richard Crowley wrote:
>> But you failed to note that this very topic was the subject of a
>> previous rather heated debate. If you had done your homework,
>> you would not have fallen into the obvious trap. This is exactly
>> why it is recommended to "lurk" on a newsgroup for several
>> weeks (months?) before jumping in and making any assumptions.
>
> Sorry about that.
>
>> Don't get me wrong, I haven't seen you write anything I disagree
>> with, but there are strong sentiments on the other side of the
>> argument, and it has all been hashed over already. You haven't
>> brought anything new to the discussion.
>
> I didn't intend this to be a discussion. Just to propose another tool
> that I thought might help people. Nothing else.

If you want to discuss double-system sound recording, (for ANY
format, and for ANY reason) then the film/TV production sound
newsgroup: news:rec.arts.movies.production.sound is a significantly
better place to do it than in *this* newsgroup. 97% of the discussion
there is about double-system sound vs. maybe 1% here?

[Back to original message]