|
Posted by NunYa Bidness on 12/20/05 05:58
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:19:22 -0500, David Levy
<d_levy@lifeisunfair.net> Gave us:
>NunYa Bidness wrote:
>
>> Note where he said LARGE sets. That would likely not include
>> the "you can get a TV at WalMart for $70" model. It would not
>> be in the LARGE category.
>
>...which is why I noted the fact that his original statement contained
>no such qualifier, and asked if he wished to amend it.
>
>
>> Knowing anything at all about the prices though, one would
>> think that you would have known that answer, and didn't really
>> need to ask the question.
>
>Knowing anything at all about how to read a Usenet thread, one would
>think that you'd be able to follow a simple discussion.
>
>
>> > > How does it deal with DTS without having a DTS decoder
>> > > (none do, because they don't need it for OTA)?
>
>> > I'm not an audiophile, but I assume that there's some
>> > theoretical inherent advantage to using digital audio inputs.
>
>> It is required for DTS AFAIK.
>
>You really *don't* know how to follow a thread, do you?
You really are an ass sometimes, aren't you?
>
>> > Many consumers are loyal to a particular electronics brand.
>> > Others might deliberately buy a relatively inexpensive
>> > digital camera that uses the same type of flash memory as
>> > their expensive TV display.
>
>> Brand centricity is not always the best, nor most economical
>> way to shop for or build one's home electronics gear set.
>
>Nor did I claim otherwise.
I never said you did. I wasn't making any claim that you had said
something incorrect. I was merely in iteration of some facts.
Sheesh. Loosen up a little.
>> The specs TV makers quote usually are for what the inputs to
>> the device will accept. It doesn't necessarily mean that it
>> gets displayed the same way it gets received. One would have
>> to examine the wording of the spec, OR the actual technical
>> data sheet for the product.
>
>Please see my other new reply (assuming that you can find it).
Definite troll, asswipe... (Assuming you can grasp that concept).
[Back to original message]
|