Posted by Citizen Bob on 11/03/06 18:43

On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:16:59 -0800, "PTravel"
<ptravel@travelersvideo.com> wrote:

>> A vague law does not bind.

>It's not a vague law. The law says: no unauthorized copying, distribution,
>preparation of derivative works, public performance or public display.
>Nothing vague about that.

That is not what's meant by a vague law. A vague law is one where a
significant number of people do not obey it because they don't
understand it.

>That's true. Worse, however, is that the entertainment industry is using
>its wealth to buy laws that are contrary to the underlying rationale of
>Article I, Section 8 and the First Amendment.

Those laws are illegitimate, and therefore do not bind.

>> The Milgram Experiments prove that most
>> people need to obey authorities even when they are wrong. I do not let
>> the Mob tell me what to do.

>Be sure to call me when you get sued, then. ;)

It would be a colossal waste of time to sue me because I don't break
any law. The Mob has mininterpreted the law and someday Congress will
stop taking bribes and do something to rectify the situation.


--

"First and last, it's a question of money. Those men who own the earth
make the laws to protect what they have. They fix up a sort of fence or
pen around what they have, and they fix the law so the fellow on the
outside cannot get in. The laws are really organized for the protection of
the men who rule the world. They were never organized or enforced to do
justice. We have no system for doing justice, not the slightest in the world."
--Clarence Darrow

[Back to original message]